![]() This would cost $5.75 on AWS S3 and the gap keeps widening with each GB. AWS CloudFront pricingĪs was already mentioned, DigitalOcean Spaces is about the same price as AWS S3, but you pay a base fee of $5 per month which gives you 250 GB. But after a year, it costs $0.085 per GB in North America and Europe, and even more elsewhere. AWS MediaConvert pricingĪnd to get the video encryption too, you need to use the Professional tier which is $0.024 per minute of HD video.Ĭloudfront does give you 50 GB of free data transfer for a year as a part of their free tier. DigitalOcean Spaces pricing Amazon Web Services PricingĪWS MediaConvert costs $0.015 per minute of HD video at <=30 fps. However, DOS is a true winner in the long run. If you are expecting to store much less than 250GB, you might find better prices elsewhere. Bunn圜DN pricingĪs for storage, With DigitalOcean Spaces you pay a base fee of $5 per month which gives you 250 GB of storage, and pay more only if more storage is needed. Even their most expensive region of Standard Network is $0.025 less than the cheapest region of CloudFront. pricingīunn圜DN recommends using the Volume Network with videos, which costs as little as $0.005 per GB. ![]() Note that each video is encoded in multiple qualities for optimized video delivery for mobile and 4K users. With Coconut, the price is $0.015 per minute of HD video including the encryption. So, is FV Player Coconut really all that cheaper than Amazon Web Services? FV Player Coconut Pricing That being said, calculating hosting, CDN and encoding services can get quite complex, especially when we start to talk about users per month and minutes of video encoded per month. With pay-as-you-go, you only really pay for what you use that given month. Even worse would be, if you only used that amount every now and then. Meaning you don’t need to stress about having to pay for a comically large package just because you need a tiny bit more than the smaller package offers. Our solutions are based on pay-as-you-go pricing models. Simplifying the plugin with a drag and drop feature is next on our bucket list. We are actively working on making the free FV Player Coconut add-on better. After uploading your source videos to DigitalOcean Spaces, everything else happens right in your WordPress. However, we would be more than happy to help you integrate with your own hosting servers or CDN if that’s what you are after.įV Player Coconut is a free add-on you can purchase here. In the base plugin, the hosting by DigitalOcean Spaces concludes the easy to use and affordable workflow. Pairing it with the increasingly beloved Bunn圜DN was a no-brainer. No hidden expenses and no inexplicably terrifying documentation or complex usage. We’ve found that easily satisfies all three of these conditions. We looked for something that was easy to use and just as powerful as AWS’s MediaConvert, while also being more affordable. While AWS is definitely great, it is undeniably as far from the comfort of YouTube or Vimeo as you can get. We get back to our key mission for video encoding – to give publishers the same experience with self-hosted video that a platform like Vimeo or YouTube provides. As most of you know, AWS is still absolutely no fun to use and requires fairly serious technical chops to get anywhere with it. They later retaliated with MediaConvert which provided a cheaper, more feature-rich transcoding with a nicer interface, but ultimately proved to be just as painful to operate in the long run. When Elastic Transcoder first appeared with its extremely complex interface and horrid documentation, we thought this will get much better with time. Today, AWS offers one of the few stand-alone encoding services. Especially with the predefined pricing models.ĪWS and similar services appeared to shake up the self-hosted video encoding landscape with Elastic Transcoder and Cloudfront CDN. While this provides a certain level of comfort, it severely lacks in freedom. However, these quickly switched their business models to forcing publishers to use their in-house hosting and CDNs. You can skip ahead, if you only want to see the pricing overview, or the example comparison.īack in the day, the first platforms focused on encoding for self-hosting emerged, for example Brightcove. Currently, FV Player supports a wide array of hosting services and CDNs you can pick from. You just upload your videos and then the video is available to all platforms and all screen sizes automatically. *Converted from $/min pricing assuming various encoded qualitiesįor years we have wanted to give publishers the same experience with self-hosted video that a platform like Vimeo or YouTube provides. If you are in a hurry, here’s what the conclusion looks like: Size
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |